Nursing Informatics Pioneers: Exploring Contributions to Health Information Technology Systems
NURS 8210N-1 Week 1 Assignment: Application 1 – Nursing Informatics Pioneers
One of the significant drivers of health care reform has been the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act (ARRA) HiTech Incentive, which allocated $22 billion in 2009 for the adoption of electronic health records (EHRs). The HiTech Act highlights the critical role that health information technology (HIT) plays in delivering quality healthcare services. Nursing informatics, as a field, has developed in tandem with these technological advancements. This assignment explores the contributions of pioneers in nursing informatics and their influence on both health informatics and nursing practice today.
Preparing for Application 1: Nursing Informatics Pioneers
To complete this assignment, visit the AMIA Video Library 1: Nursing Informatics Pioneers webpage, where you will find biographies and presentations from key figures in the field. Select two pioneers who have made significant contributions and conduct further research on their work. You will compare their achievements and evaluate how their contributions have influenced the evolution of health information technology and nursing practice.
By Day 7 of Week 2: Complete a Scholarly Comparison of Two Pioneers
In your 3- to 4-page paper, address the following:
- Professional Accomplishments: Summarize the major contributions of each nursing informatics pioneer.
- Influence on Nursing Practice: Discuss how their work has shaped nursing practice, particularly through the integration of technology.
- Shaping the Field of Nursing Informatics: Explain the pioneers’ impact on the development of nursing informatics as a distinct discipline.
- Lessons Learned: Identify key lessons from their careers and contributions.
- Application to Professional Practice: Consider which skills or ideas demonstrated by these pioneers could be applied in your own nursing practice.
NURS8210 Grading Rubric
Points are awarded based on the depth and clarity of your analysis, including:
- Professional accomplishments (3 points)
- Influence on nursing practice (3 points)
- Contributions to nursing informatics (3 points)
- Lessons learned (3 points)
- Skills/ideas applied to practice (3 points)
- Grammar, spelling, and adherence to APA style (points deducted as applicable)
NURS 8210N-1 Week 1 Discussion and Assignment Submission
Throughout this course, you will engage in discussions and assignments that encourage staying current with trends and issues in healthcare. Subscribe to a reliable source of healthcare updates, and review these regularly to inform your discussions and assignments. When submitting your assignments, use the specified file naming convention and follow the guidelines for uploading your work to ensure proper submission.
This project not only highlights the role of nursing informatics pioneers but also fosters an appreciation for how technology continues to transform the nursing profession.
NURS 8210N-1 Week 1: Introduction to Health Information Technology Systems and Nursing Informatics
In 1943, Tom Watson, chairman of IBM, famously stated, “I think there is a world market for maybe five computers.” He could not have foreseen how computers would later revolutionize every aspect of society, including healthcare. Today, the integration of technology has dramatically enhanced the quality of patient care. From barcode scanners used for documenting patient medications to robotic systems performing minimally invasive surgeries, technology is reshaping healthcare. As these innovations continue to emerge, nurses must develop new skills to effectively utilize these tools and drive the future of healthcare.
This week’s content in NURS 8210N will guide you through the history of nursing informatics and the role of the Technology Informatics Guiding Education Reform (TIGER) initiative in shaping technology education for nurses. You’ll also evaluate your own informatics competencies using the TIGER and American Nurses Association guidelines.
Learning Objectives for Week 1:
- Understand how informatics has transformed nursing practice.
- Assess how informatics competencies impact nursing practice and care quality.
- Utilize online learning resources to enhance professional development.
- Compare the contributions of two pioneers in nursing informatics.
Required Readings:
The course will delve into essential resources that explore how technology and informatics are transforming nursing, beginning with key texts like Ball et al.’s Nursing Informatics: Where Technology and Caring Meet and foundational documents from the American Nurses Association.
For further reading and assignments, please refer to the course materials for access to the comprehensive list of resources, including articles on the history of health informatics and global perspectives on its development.
Media Resources:
In this week’s media presentation, you will explore the broad applications of health informatics and how it benefits patients, healthcare professionals, and organizations.
By engaging with this week’s materials, you’ll gain a deeper understanding of the ongoing technological evolution in healthcare and how it is shaping the future of nursing practice.
NURS 8210 Week 1 Discussion Rubric: Introduction to Health Information Technology Systems and Nursing Informatics Pioneers
| Criteria | Exemplary (4 points) | Proficient (3 points) | Sufficient (2 points) | Developing (0-1 points) |
| Discussion Postings and Responses | – Postings and responses fully meet the requirements, submitted on time. | – Postings and responses meet the requirements and are submitted on time. | – Postings and responses are submitted on time but do not fully meet the requirements. | – Postings and responses are late or do not meet the requirements. |
| – Rich, relevant examples, well-researched, and respectful of others’ opinions. | – Provide relevant examples, appropriate research, and are respectful of others’ opinions. | – Provide minimal examples or research; respectful but with limited depth in analysis. | – Lack examples or research support and fail to contribute to discussion respectfully or effectively. | |
| – Demonstrates in-depth understanding with insightful analysis and accurate, well-supported interpretations. | – Demonstrates understanding, but viewpoints are not always well-supported; some depth in analysis is shown. | – Demonstrates minimal understanding, with surface-level engagement and occasional omissions or errors. | – Lacks understanding of core concepts, with inaccuracies or many errors in interpretation. | |
| – Synthesizes key ideas from peers’ posts, showing clear evidence of engagement with colleagues’ insights. | – Shows evidence of engagement with some peers’ posts, synthesizing ideas to some extent. | – Little engagement with peers’ posts; some synthesis of ideas but lacks depth. | – No evidence of engagement with colleagues’ posts or synthesis of peer insights. |
Must Read: